Jones Travel MartA Triad planning exercise for the Jones Travel Mart, Cameron, Missouri. In September 2006, a systematic planning meeting was held in Jefferson City, Missouri, about the Jones Travel Mart, Cameron, Missouri. Attendees included MDNR, the state contractor administering the PSTIF, a Jones Travel mart consultant, MDNR, and EPA and Argonne representatives. The consultants for the site owners defined the problem at the site by using the conceptual site model (CSM) available (information available on the Jones Travel Mart QuickPlace site). An exit strategy was developed assuming the following:
By February 2007 or upon transfer of ownership, a work plan to determine the extent of contamination in the vadose zone will be prepared and implemented. After implementation of the vadose zone characterization effort, an RMP, if needed, will be conceived and implemented. During the brief systematic planning session, several goals to be achieved were discussed:
The critical components for developing future decision logic were:
Participants used QuickPlace Jones Travel Mart Web site and teleconferences led by EPA TII and Missouri PSTIF as a resource for communicating and critiquing and strengthening planning documents during the plan development stage. There have been two field mobilizations to date. Site ProgressSite investigators utilized a number of Triad principles to characterize the site. RTMS (in this case a MIP and a DWS) was used to characterize the Jones Travel Mart Site. The Jones Travel Mart site has not been sold or redeveloped, to date but the Triad principles employed as part of the site characterization appear to have assisted the MDNR, PSTIF staff, and Jones Travel Mart representatives in refining the CSM for the site. However, to some extent, investigation approaches and agreements established during systematic planning sessions were not honored by all participants, thus detracting from the value of the highly dense data set that RTMS(s) are capable of generating. The perceived disconnect between the quality of the data generated by the RTMS used and archival data (in some cases, 2 to 3 years old) caused MDNR to view the MIP data as less trustworthy. As a result, participants had a natural tendency to default to standard practices and sample and analyze environmental media samples at each MIP sample location rather than using fixed laboratory sample results to augment the dense data set the MIP is capable of generating. The status of the project since January 2008 is unknown. |
Home | Introduction | Background | Case Studies | Best Practices | References FAQ | Glossary | Internet Resources | Contacts Privacy/Security | Site Index |