Triad is a Federal/State Interagency Partnership
Training Classes and Materials
Information on Triad training classes and associated presentation materials are available via this section.
- CLU-IN Upcoming Courses and Conferences – USEPA, This section of CLU-IN lists information on upcoming courses and conferences related to hazardous waste characterization and remediation. It allows you to search by event name, description, location, and date.
- Trainex: EPA's Classroom Training Website – USEPA, This website lists training opportunities for federal, state, tribal, and local government staff involved in hazardous waste management and remediation. Included are schedules for deliveries of many courses, both classroom and Internet-based.
- Best Management Practices for Site Assessment, Remediation, and Greener Cleanups - November 15, 2011, New York, New York – USEPA, The Best Management Practices for Site Assessment, Site Remediation, and Green Remediation Footprint Reduction course is comprised of the following three Best Management Practices (BMP) sessions: BMPs for Site Assessments, BMPs for Site Remediation, and BMPs for Green Remediation Footprint Reduction.
- Triad Training for Practitioners - November 16 - 18, 2011, New York, New York – USEPA, This course is based on best management practices (BMP) implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), partnership organizations, federal and state partners, and consultants. Participants will learn how the Triad Approach can be used to streamline projects in a legal, technically sound, and cost-effective manner.
Upcoming Internet Seminars
- Superfund Redevelopment Initiative Series: Bringing Industrial Reuse to Superfund Sites – U.S. EPA, Office of Land and Emergency Management (OLEM), Superfund Redevelopment Initiative
February 27, 2018, 2:00PM-3:30PM EST, 19:00-20:30 GMT
From cleanup to final settlement or leasing agreements, EPA plays a central role in facilitating the cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites by bringing together key parties. EPA works with stakeholders to negotiate settlement agreements, resolve competing liens and ensure future reuse is compatible with the cleanup. Collaborative work on the Buckbee-Mears site in Cortland, New York, and the Tex Tin Superfund site in Texas City, Texas, positioned sites for successful industrial reuse outcomes, advancing economic development opportunities throughout the community.
- FRTR Presents...Remediation Technologies for Radionuclides and Heavy Metals in Soil, Ground Water and Sediments, Session 1 – Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR)
February 28, 2018, 1:00PM-3:00PM EST, 18:00-20:00 GMT
This webinar is part of a series featuring presentations delivered at the November 2017 FRTR Meeting. This meeting focused on remediation technologies for radionuclides and heavy metals in soil, ground water and sediments. More information about the meeting can be found at https://frtr.gov/meetings1.htm. This webinar will provide an overview of the technologies as well as the strategies to implement these technologies in remediation of radionuclides and heavy metals in soil, ground water, and sediments.
- ERTP Presents...Pragmatic Approaches to Remedial Investigation, Technology Selection, and Remediation Success – EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) and the Environmental Response Training Program (ERTP)
March 15, 2018, 1:00PM-3:00PM EST, 17:00-19:00 GMT
This webinar will discuss high resolution site characterization using direct-sensing and data visualization tools to rapidly build the conceptual site model in an adaptive process. We strive for timeframes of months, not years, by starting with the end in mind and employing a collaborative team approach, including our state, tribal, industrial and community counterparts. Goal one is to gain a confident understanding of the spatial and matrix distribution of contaminants of concern. Goal two is to rapidly gather information essential to informing potential remedy choices focused on root causes. Goal three is to minimize mobilizations and transaction costs by evaluating data and identifying data gaps in real-time while the investigation team is still in the field. By including all project stakeholders in the investigation and decision-making process, the report becomes a reflection of the team's findings, interpretations and decisions, rather than one party's opinion piece subject to debate. This presentation will briefly describe the approach and focus on recent work at sites of different scales to showcase the process and workflows that demonstrate its effectiveness.
- Comparison Studies on Radiation Risk and Dose Assessment Models for Radioactively Contaminated Soil, Inside Buildings and Outside Surfaces – U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation
March 19, 2018, 1:30PM-3:00PM EDT, 17:30-19:00 GMT
A participant for the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Research Participation Program, Nasser Shubayr, while at EPA's Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation has worked on five research projects on risk and dose assessment models recommended by governmental agencies for investigating radioactively contaminated soil, inside buildings and outside surfaces. These research projects studied 17 models that are used nationally and internationally. This webinar presents:
- overview for the models,
- review of selected default input parameters used by each model,
- radiation and chemical assessment methodological consistency between US EPA and UK Environmental Agency,
- overview of models used to assess contaminated outdoor surfaces, and
- comparison between EPAs models and DOE model for indoor contaminated buildings.
The objective of these research projects is to make recommendations on technical and practical issues to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI), facilitating better understanding of each agency's modeling approach and identifying the similarities and differences between these agencies in the risk and dose assessment of radioactively contaminated sites.
- Characterization and Remediation of Fractured Rock – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
February 22, 2018, 1:00PM-3:15PM EST, 18:00-20:15 GMT
Characterization and remediation of contaminated groundwater in fractured rock has not been conducted or studied as broadly as groundwater at unconsolidated porous media sites. This unfamiliarity and lack of experience can make fractured rock sites perplexing. This situation is especially true in portions of the U.S. where bedrock aquifers are a primary source of drinking and process water, and demands on water are increasing. As a result, remedial activities often default to containment of contaminant plumes, point of use treatment and long-term monitoring rather than active reduction of risk. However, this attitude does not incorporate recent advances in the science and technology of fractured rock site characterization and remediation.
The basis for this training course is the ITRC guidance: Characterization and Remediation of Fractured Rock. The purpose of this guidance is to dispel the belief that fractured rock sites are too complex to characterize and remediate. The physical, chemical and contaminant transport concepts in fractured rock have similarities to unconsolidated porous media, yet there are important differences. These differences are the focus of this guidance.
By participating in this training class, you should learn to:
- Use ITRCs Fractured Rock Document to guide your decision making so you can:
- Develop quality Conceptual Site Models (CSMs) for fractured rock sites
- Set realistic remedial objectives
- Select the best remedial options
- Monitor remedial progress and assess results
- Value an interdisciplinary site team approach to bring collective expertise to improve decision making and to have confidence when going beyond containment and monitoring - - to actually remediating fractured rock sites.
Case studies of successful fractured rock remediation are presented to provide examples of how fractured rock sites can be evaluated and available tools applied to characterization and remediation.
Training participants are encouraged to view the associated ITRC guidance, Characterization and Remediation of Fractured Rock
prior to attending the class.
- Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
March 8, 2018, 1:00PM-3:15PM EST, 18:00-20:15 GMT
Sites contaminated with dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) and DNAPL mixtures present significant environmental challenges. Despite the decades spent on characterizing and attempting to remediate DNAPL sites, substantial risk remains. Inadequate characterization of site geology as well as the distribution, characteristics, and behavior of contaminants -- by relying on traditional monitoring well methods rather than more innovative and integrated approaches -- has limited the success of many remediation efforts.
The Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization Team has synthesized the knowledge about DNAPL site characterization and remediation acquired over the past several decades, and has integrated that information into a new document, Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tools Selection (ISC-1, 2015). This guidance is a resource to inform regulators, responsible parties, other problem holders, consultants, community stakeholders, and other interested parties of the critical concepts related to characterization approaches and tools for collecting subsurface data at DNAPL sites. After this associated training, participants will be able to use the ITRC Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tools Selection (ISC-1, 2015) guidance to develop and support an integrated approach to DNAPL site characterization, including:
- Identify what site conditions must be considered when developing an informative DNAPL conceptual site model (CSM)
- Define an objectives-based DNAPL characterization strategy
- Understand what tools and resources are available to improve the identification, collection, and evaluation of appropriate site characterization data
- Navigate the DNAPL characterization tools table and select appropriate technologies to fill site-specific data gaps
- Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
March 22, 2018, 1:00PM-3:15PM EDT, 17:00-19:15 GMT
For decades, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has produced and used military munitions for live-fire testing and training to prepare the U.S. military for combat operations. As a result, unexploded ordnance (UXO) and discarded military munitions may be present at over 5,200 former ranges and former munitions operating facilities throughout the United States. With the traditional technique to identify munitions for removal at these sites, DOD and its contractors have used various types of detection instruments to simply detect buried metal objects then excavation and examination of most of the detected items, to determine whether or not they are military munitions. Even highly trained UXO-qualified personnel typically excavate hundreds of metal items for each one munition recovered. Nearly half of these sites require a munitions response, at an estimated cost to complete of $14 billion and with a completion date of 2100. To improve the efficiency of munitions response, DODs Environmental Security Technology Certification Program and its research partners in academia and industry have developed a new approach: geophysical classification. Geophysical classification is the process of using advanced data to make principled decisions as to whether buried metal objects are potentially hazardous munitions (that is targets of interest) that should be excavated, or items such as metal clutter and debris (non-targets of interest) that can be left in the ground.
ITRCs Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response (GCMR-2, 2015) and training class explain the process of geophysical classification, describe its benefits and limitations, and discuss the information and data needed by regulators to monitor and evaluate the use of the technology. This document and training also emphasize using a systematic planning process to develop data acquisition and decision strategies at the outset of a munitions response effort, as well as quality considerations throughout the project. Stakeholder issues that are unique to munitions response are also discussed. After this training class, participants will:
- Understand the technology and terminology
- Be ready to engage in the planning process to address quality considerations throughout a project
- Find tools to transfer knowledge within organizations and to stakeholders
- Start to transition mindset to decisions that leave non-hazardous items in the ground
An audience who understand current munitions response tools and procedures (for example, geophysical surveys, sensors, data analysis) will benefit most from this document and training. For federal and state environmental regulators, scientists, and engineers, as well as contractors, munitions response managers, technical staff, geophysicists, and stakeholders, this document explains how geophysical classification can be used in munitions response. Stakeholders with an interest in a particular munitions response site (MRS) at which classification has been or may be proposed will also benefit from this document and training.
For use during this training class, we created a reference with the Terminology and Acronyms used in ITRC Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Training.
- Groundwater Statistics for Environmental Project Managers – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
March 27, 2018, 1:00PM-3:15PM EDT, 17:00-19:15 GMT
Statistical techniques may be used throughout the process of cleaning up contaminated groundwater. It is challenging for practitioners, who are not experts in statistics, to interpret, and use statistical techniques. ITRC developed the Technical and Regulatory Web-based Guidance on Groundwater Statistics and Monitoring Compliance (GSMC-1, 2013, http://www.itrcweb.org/gsmc-1/) and this associated training specifically for environmental project managers who review or use statistical calculations for reports, who make recommendations or decisions based on statistics, or who need to demonstrate compliance for groundwater projects. The training class will encourage and support project managers and others who are not statisticians to:
- Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
March 29, 2018, 1:00PM-3:15PM EDT, 17:00-19:15 GMT
Optimization activities can improve performance, increase monitoring efficiency, and support contaminated site decisions. Project managers can use geospatial analysis for evaluation of optimization opportunities. Unlike traditional statistical analysis, geospatial methods incorporate the spatial and temporal dependence between nearby data points, which is an important feature of almost all data collected as part of an environmental investigation. The results of geospatial analyses add additional lines of evidence to decision making in optimization opportunities in environmental sites across all project life cycle stages (release detection, site characterization, remediation, monitoring and closure) in soil, groundwater or sediment remediation projects for different sizes and types of sites.
The purpose of ITRC's Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites (GRO-1) guidance document and this associated training is to explain, educate, and train state regulators and other practitioners in understanding and using geospatial analyses to evaluate optimization opportunities at environmental sites. With the ITRC GRO-1 web-based guidance document and this associated training class, project managers will be able to:
- Evaluate available data and site needs to determine if geospatial analyses are appropriate for a given site
- For a project and specific lifecycle stage, identify optimization questions where geospatial methods can contribution to better decision making
- For a project and optimization question(s), select appropriate geospatial method(s) and software using the geospatial analysis work flow, tables and flow charts in the guidance document
- With geospatial analyses results (note: some geospatial analyses may be performed by the project manager, but many geospatial analyses will be performed by technical experts), explain what the results mean and appropriately apply in decision making
- Use the project managers tool box, interactive flow charts for choosing geospatial methods and review checklist to use geospatial analyses confidently in decision making
Archived Internet Seminars
- Dynamic Data Collection Strategy Using Systematic Planning and Innovative Field-Based Measurement Technologies – USEPA & USACE, This seminar reviews the importance of systematic planning as a prelude to dynamic work strategies and innovative measurement technologies. Case studies illustrate site characterization, removal/remedial action and treatment system optimization.
- The Triad Approach to Better Cleanup Projects: Illustrated with the Tree Fruit Case Study – USEPA, This seminar introduces the importance of systematic project planning to ensure the quality of project decisions. Dynamic work strategies and field measurement technologies simultaneously bring down project costs while increasing decision confidence.
- Field Analytical Technologies for VOCs in Groundwater – USEPA, This seminar describes an evaluation the ETV Program did for five different technologies for generating field analytical measurements of VOCs in groundwater. Basic principles of operation underlying the various technologies is presented, along with a summary of the performance of each of the technologies with their advantages and limitations.
- Field-Based Analytical Methods for Explosive Compound – USEPA, This seminar covers field-based methods for explosives residues in soil and water, including the analytical challenges posed by compounds with a short review of fixed-lab methods. Sampling considerations for water and soil matrices are also covered, with particular emphasis on the extreme spatial heterogeneity generally found in soils.
- Field-Based Geophysical Technologies – USEPA, This 2-hr seminar starts with the basic science behind geophysical technologies and how they fit into smarter approaches to cleaning up hazardous waste sites. Throughout the seminar, instructors describe how the use of systematic planning, dynamic work strategies, and field technologies are applied to developing a CSM that can reliably guide site cleanup activities.
- Uses of Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) – USEPA, Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) is free software that incorporates tools from environmental assessment fields into an effective problem solving environment. These tools include integrated modules for visualization, geospatial analysis, statistical analysis, human health risk assessment, ecological risk assessment, cost/benefit analysis, sampling design, and decision analysis. This seminar highlights the tools uses, but is not a tutorial for the software.
Training Presentation Slides
The links below lead to Triad training materials (PowerPoint presentations, video clips, etc.) developed by members of the Triad working group.
- Modules from the Field-based Technologies Training Program – USEPA, This website provides access to training materials used for deliveries of Triad-related training courses.
- Triad Course Delivery at the National Site Assessment Symposium, June 28, 2004, San Diego, – USEPA, PPT slides for modules of the full-day delivery of training and case studies.
- Is the Triad Approach Really Something New? (Presenter: Deana Crumbling, USEPA) (319 KB)
- Triad's Systematic Planning Process (Presenter: Andrianne Saboya, US Navy PWC Environmental Dept.) (206 KB)
- Evolving Conceptual Site Models (CSMs) in Real-time for Cost Effective Projects (Presenter: Kira Lynch, USACE, Seattle District) (8.0 MB)
- Building A Second-Generation Data Quality Model (Presenter: Deana Crumbling, USEPA) (1.7 MB)
- Introduction to 3-D Mapping Techniques (Presenter: Timothy Shields, Anteon Corp./US Navy PWC) (6.7 MB)
- Video Clip of in-situ downward direct-push deployed GeoVIS moving downward beginning at the base of grassy soil surface to the top of the capillary fringe (25.7 MB/AVI)
- Video Clip of in-situ downward direct-push deployed GeoVIS moving downward through the capillary fringe (11.7 MB/MPG)
- Video Clip of in-situ downward direct-push deployed GeoVIS moving into NAPL contaminated groudwater (35.7 MB/AVI)
- Accelerated VOC Source Investigation Pairing SCAPS/MIP with EPA Triad, Camp Pendleton, California (Presenter: Karen Collins, Anteon Corp./US Navy PWC) (2.4 MB)
- East Palo Alto Case Study: Pesticide Investigation using the Triad Approach (Presenter: Deana Crumbling, USEPA and Lily Lee, USEPA Region 9 Brownfields Program) (1.5 MB)
- Wrap-Up & Questions (Presenter: Deana Crumbling, USEPA) (244 KB)